News feed

news feed

July 2017The Usability of Task Modeling Tools paper was accepted to the IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing, VL/HCC 2017. This paper is the outcome of a collaboration with the Human Interfaces in Information Systems Laboratory of the National Research Council of Italy, CNR.

We ran a user study on an instrumented ConcurTaskTrees Environment (CTTE) to isolate the problems encountered by designers, identify the workarounds employed to overcome such problems and understand the workflows exhibited. The analysis of the logged user interface events and eye-tracking data uncovers five workflows that illustrate how the task model hierarchy is populated and edited, operators are added to tasks, and when model consistency is checked. These findings inform design implications for task modeling tools and formulate hypotheses for future work.

July 2017 — We got the best paper award at the 9th ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems, EICS 2017.

picture of Markel Vigo and Aitor Apaolaza receiving the awards snapshot of the award

We are very happy to receive the best paper award for our paper WevQuery: Testing Hypotheses about Web Interaction Patterns at EICS 2017 in Lisbon (Portugal). The Programme Chair, Jeffrey Nichols from Google, made the announcement during the conference dinner. The paper has been published in the first issue of the Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction.

April 2017 — Paper accepted to the 9th ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems, EICS 2017: WevQuery: Testing Hypotheses about Web Interaction Patterns.

WevQuery is a scalable system to query user interaction logs in order to allow designers to test their hypotheses about users' behaviour. WevQuery supports this purpose using a graphical notation to define the interaction patterns designers are seeking. WevQuery is scalable as the queries can then be executed against large user interaction datasets by employing the MapReduce paradigm. We showcase the potential of WevQuery, from the design of the queries to their execution on real interaction data accounting for 5.7m events generated by 2,445 unique users.

January 2017 — Paper accepted to the International Journal of Human-Computer Studies: Real-Time Detection of Navigation Problems on the World 'Wild' Web.

A screen capture of WebTactics, the tool used to detect navigation problems

We propose (and empirically validate in the field) a set of algorithms to detect Web navigation problems in real time. This approach is ground-breaking in that existing approaches are applied on a post hoc basis, which are resource consuming and prevent a prompt intervention to repair the cause of problems. Our work opens up new avenues to real time delivery of support and adaptive web interventions to alleviate the detected problems.

September 2016 — Paper accepted to EKAW: "Making Entailment Set Changes Explicit Improves the Understanding of Consequences of Ontology Authoring Actions".

Screen capture of the inference inspector tool

When authoring ontologies, one single authoring action can have a number of implicit consequences that are difficult to grasp. This is a known problem for those who build ontologies. In this paper we address this problem by engineering a tool, the 'Inference Inspector' that makes this implicit changes not only explicit, but also understandable and actionable. We empirically suggest the effectiveness of our approach in two experiments with ontology authors.

March 2016 — Two journal papers accepted: Exploring the relationship between web accessibility and user experience was accepted to the International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. Group versus Individual Web Accessibility Evaluations: Effects with Novice Evaluators was accepted to Interacting with Computers.

front pages of the two journals side by side

In the "Exploring the relationship..." paper we found that perceived Web accessibility is significantly correlated with UX, while the relationship between UX and conformance to WCAG 2.0 is more elusive.

In the "Group versus Individual..." paper we found that employing a group of two people is more useful than having individuals carrying out the assessment in order to reduce the false negatives rate.

December 2015 — Paper accepted: we got a paper accepted to CHI 2016: To Sign Up, or not to Sign Up? Maximizing Citizen Science Contribution Rates through Optional Registration.

A snapshot of a fossil and a piece of paper next to it

We run an A/B testing experiment on Reading Nature's Library citizen science platform and we found that optional registration maximizes citizen science contribution rates.

November 2015 — New project: I'm happy to announce that the EU H2020 programme is going to fund the MOVING project with ~€3.5M during 3 years.

Logo of the European Union's Horizon 2020 research programme

Through this project we will enable users to improve their information literacy by training how to use, choose, reflect and evaluate data mining methods in connection with their daily research tasks and to become data-savvy information professionals. I'm the University of Manchester PI in a consortium with 9 project partners across 6 countries led by the Centre for Research and Technology-Hellas (CERTH) and includes The German National Library of Economics, Ernst & Young and The Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences among others.